Okay, fine. You can hold your opinion, and I'll hold mine.

Personally, I do not feel that ringing the gong is wrong.

I don't like yer sig VI :P and you're hearin this directly from SPAZZO!!!

LOL, no, the code is only meant to protect purposeful cruelty. It might seem to say certain things, but ringing the gong and eating a stew are not purposeful harm.

I think forcing a bad stew on a villager is against the code, though. And they won't usually eat one themselves.

LOL "Spazzo". I know the intent of the SPCV. Just having fun pokeing holes in it. :P

I'm glad you're having so much fun, then! lol

*fights urge to be overly sarcastic* must fight..... ARGH! lol jk

A lot of good happens a lot when you get one villager to ring the gong and they also celebrate this by all running to it and jumping. So I would not take that pleaser away from my villagers.

By the same logic VI, there are some harmful events, so they should not be allowed to have events. Keeping the game paused would indeed keep anything bad from happening to the villagers

Incorrect. The events have a choice to be safe and a choice to take a chance.

Jazzo, you may be the President of the SPCV, but I'll not hesitate to contradict you!
There happen to be two events that can or do have bad effects without a choice!
The Flash Flood and The Dense Fog.
True, The Dense Fog can have a good effect, but not so with The Flash Flood!

Krystal, I'm counting on you to contradict me. That's what smart people do, contradict each other, no? I do see your point but again, are you purposely doing harm by "getting an event"? no.